XIO Compliance Brain — Triad Review on MI300X

XIO Compliance Brain helps lawyers, compliance officers, and regulated businesses review high-stakes documents — offering memoranda, KYC files, marketing decks, regulator letters, privacy memos, and contract clauses. Instead of producing one opaque chatbot answer (the failure mode of every generic legal-AI demo), it runs three AI reviewer perspectives in parallel against the same matter: • Regulatory Counsel — finds rule breaches, missing disclosures, and jurisdiction issues against NI 45-106 / OSC Rule 45-501 / NI 31-103 • Risk Officer — scores severity, investor exposure, and operational risk • Evidence Auditor — verifies citations, flags stale or jurisdictionally mismatched authorities, and refuses to sign off on unsupported claims A synthesis pass surfaces where reviewers agreed, diverged, and what the human owner should do next. An optional Round 2 has each voice defend, update, or concede their stance based on the synthesis. Every finding cites a retrieved authority. Outputs are bound to a SHA-256 hash before approval. Export of DOCX, redline PDF, and CRUMB-style audit handoff packs is gated on hash-confirmed sign-off. Every audit row stamps which inference engine served the matter, so a review run today on AMD/Qwen has the same audit shape as one tomorrow on OpenAI. The full ensemble — three reviewers, synthesis, and optional Round 2 — runs on a single AMD Instinct MI300X serving Qwen 2.5 72B via vLLM. 192 GB HBM3 is what makes parallel ensembles economical; cloud APIs would need roughly 4× H100s for the same workload (~$0.04 self-hosted vs ≈$8 cloud per Triad Review). Live: https://compliance-ai-amd-demo-production.up.railway.app/demo/judge Source: https://github.com/XioAISolutions/compliance-AI HF Space: https://huggingface.co/spaces/slavazeph/xio-compliance-brain-triad-review