
Injury Risk Review mimics how a sports science department actually debates injury risk: instead of one model announcing a verdict, four specialized agents argue it out. A Load Analyst flags concerning training-loads patterns from raw data. A Context Skeptic actively hunts for a non-injury explanation, position norms, fixture congestion, injury history, before accepting the flag, and can genuinely overturn it. A Conductor owns the room-level coordination, routing between specialists and tracking debate rounds. A Report Writer joins only once the debate resolves, producing a coaching note that preserves any unresolved disagreement rather than forcing a false consensus. All four collaborate through Band as a real coordination layer.
19 Jun 2026