Florian Griffon@FloG

Injury Risk Review mimics how a sports science department actually debates injury risk: instead of one model announcing a verdict, four specialized agents argue it out. A Load Analyst flags concerning training-loads patterns from raw data. A Context Skeptic actively hunts for a non-injury explanation, position norms, fixture congestion, injury history, before accepting the flag, and can genuinely overturn it. A Conductor owns the room-level coordination, routing between specialists and tracking debate rounds. A Report Writer joins only once the debate resolves, producing a coaching note that preserves any unresolved disagreement rather than forcing a false consensus. All four collaborate through Band as a real coordination layer.

📅 June 12–19, 2026 • June 12: Kick-off Stream • June 12–19: Online Build Phase • June 19: Project Submissions Ends 🌍 Fully online hackathon. Join and build from anywhere in the world. 🤝 Build practical enterprise workflows where AI agents communicate, coordinate, exchange context, and complete work together. 🧠 Powered by Band and Codeband, built for collaborative AI systems and agent orchestration. 🏆 Prize Pool: $10,000+ 🧑‍💻 Apply now to build the next generation of enterprise multi-agent systems.