
6
2
Pakistan
1 year of experience
Biomedical Engineering student at Ziauddin University with a focus on AI-driven health tech. Building things at the intersection of machine learning, embedded systems, and clinical applications — from wearable biosignal monitors to multi-agent biomedical research pipelines. Always building, always shipping.

Capable candidates get rejected by broken evaluation systems that reward presentation over substance. No feedback. No transparency. No accountability. Just silence. VERDICT was built to fix that. VERDICT is a multi-agent candidate evaluation system where four specialized AI agents collaborate through Band to assess candidates across research program admissions, corporate hiring, and compliance screening. Each agent processes the candidate profile in sequence and posts its output to a Band room, handing off context to the next agent in the pipeline: - Evidence Extractor parses the candidate profile for verifiable, concrete signals — projects, skills, experience, achievements. - Criteria Mapper scores that evidence against explicit role requirements with per-criterion justification and an overall fit score. - Bias Auditor flags irrelevant evaluation factors — geographic bias, institutional prestige bias, GPA cutoff rigidity, publication gatekeeping. - Accountability Agent produces a mandatory structured verdict (ADVANCE / WAITLIST / REJECT) with full evidence citations, candidate feedback, and an improvement roadmap. The system was validated with a real candidate profile: a Biomedical Engineering undergraduate applying to the MITACS Globalink Research Internship. VERDICT returned a WAITLIST verdict at 80% confidence, caught three bias flags, and produced a 70/100 signal score — all with full reasoning visible in the Band feed. Built on Flask, LangGraph, LangChain, Groq (Llama 3.3 70B), and the Band REST API. This system exists because the current process failed someone who deserved better. VERDICT cannot give back what was lost. But it can make sure the next candidate gets an answer they can actually use.
19 Jun 2026

ARIA — Autonomous Research Intelligence Agent — is a five-stage multi-agent system designed to eliminate the manual bottleneck in biomedical literature review. Researchers currently spend weeks identifying, screening, and synthesizing published evidence before any meaningful analysis can begin. ARIA compresses that entire workflow into under sixty seconds. Built on Llama 3.3 70B deployed on AMD MI300X hardware, the pipeline operates through five specialized agents: a Query Architect that generates optimized PubMed search strings from natural language input, a Literature Scout that fetches papers from PubMed and Europe PMC simultaneously, a PRISMA Filter that screens each paper against clinical relevance criteria, an Evidence Synthesizer that constructs a structured report with graded evidence levels and research gap analysis, and a Citation Builder that formats all references to standard. Beyond synthesis, ARIA offers a Predictive Model generating constructive and destructive research forecasts, a methodology comparison table, a follow-up question interface grounded exclusively in the retrieved dataset, and one-click PDF export of the complete review. The business case is direct: pharmaceutical teams, clinical trial designers, and academic institutions spend significant resources on systematic reviews that ARIA automates at scale. The system is hardware-optimized for AMD MI300X infrastructure, making it a viable enterprise deployment on existing clusters. ARIA does not summarize the internet — it synthesizes verified, source-linked, peer-reviewed evidence. That distinction is what makes it production-relevant for regulated research environments.
10 May 2026